<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>the-opinions.com</title>
    <link>https://the-opinions.com/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://the-opinions.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Evidence-based opinion on plant science, climate and agricultural policy. One argued article a week.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 05:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Golden Rice Cleared Every Safety Review by 2021. What Has Kept It From Farmers Since Is Litigation, Not Science.</title>
      <link>https://the-opinions.com/articles/05-golden-rice-delay.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-opinions.com/articles/05-golden-rice-delay.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Crop Biotech &amp; GMOs</category>
      <description>Four regulators found GR2E Golden Rice as safe as conventional rice between 2017 and 2021, and a 24-province pilot then grew and distributed it. What stopped it in 2024 was a Writ of Kalikasan sought by advocacy organisations, not any new scientific finding. The concession, the evidence, and the pending Supreme Court case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science Journalists Are Not Equipped to Cover Plant Biotechnology — Here Is the Evidence</title>
      <link>https://the-opinions.com/articles/04-science-journalists-plant-biotech.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-opinions.com/articles/04-science-journalists-plant-biotech.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Science Communication</category>
      <description>Recurring misrepresentations in mainstream plant-biotech reporting are not isolated errors — they are a documented structural failure that propagates from press releases through wire syndication into binding regulation. Five error modes, the propagation pipeline, and a positive standard.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sub-Saharan Africa&#x27;s Plant Science Research Infrastructure Is Being Built on Donor Dependency — That Must Change</title>
      <link>https://the-opinions.com/articles/03-sub-saharan-africa-donor-dependency.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-opinions.com/articles/03-sub-saharan-africa-donor-dependency.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Science in Developing Nations</category>
      <description>Structural critique of externally-funded agricultural research programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: five mechanisms by which donor dependency actively harms plant science, the endogenous building blocks already in place, and a five-pillar reform agenda for the post-USAID era.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elevated CO₂ Does Not Uniformly Benefit Crop Yields, and the Fertilization Narrative That Claims Otherwise Has a Funded Lineage and a Measurable Policy Cost</title>
      <link>https://the-opinions.com/articles/02-co2-crop-yields.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-opinions.com/articles/02-co2-crop-yields.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Climate &amp; Plant Systems</category>
      <description>Critical evaluation of the CO₂ fertilization effect: the chamber-to-field gap, C3/C4 asymmetry, nutrient dilution, the industry-origin history of the optimist narrative, and the quantifiable policy cost of carrying it into climate-economic models.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Blanket Regulatory Asymmetry Between Transgenic and Gene-Edited Crops Is Not Scientifically Proportionate to Risk</title>
      <link>https://the-opinions.com/articles/01-regulatory-asymmetry-transgenic-gene-edited-crops.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-opinions.com/articles/01-regulatory-asymmetry-transgenic-gene-edited-crops.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Crop Biotech &amp; GMOs</category>
      <description>Some regulatory differences between transgenic and gene-edited crops have scientific grounding. The current global patchwork does not. An argued case for risk-proportionate, product-based governance of agricultural innovation.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
